Asbjørn Ulsberg
Why on earth is it wrong to have RSS or Atom entries, which share 90% of their properties (sender/author, receiver/subscriber, subject/title, message body/content/summary) with e-mail in your e-mail client?
Leopard Analysis Part II
This is the second part of my personal analysis of Apple’s OS X upgrade, Leopard, that will be available in October. I’m focusing on the enhancements to the features and applications I use frequently and of course new features, application and innovations from Apple that looks useful for me personally. The first part of the analysis is available here.
Spaces
Is the Spaces feature worth the $129 price tag? Probably not, but if your files, desktop and windows are a mess and you throw Quick Look and Stacks in to the mix, we are getting closer.
The new version of Mail, integrates nicely with both the Address Book and iCal. I’m not using iCal much because I don’t really have a personal life that I need to plan in detail, but for those of you who do, I think you will like the new version of Mail.
On the con-side of things, it looks like Mail is on its way to became a classic case of Bloatware. It now features To Do lists, notes, an RSS reader and stationery templates. Perhaps To Do lists and notes should be iCal features instead? And RSS in my mail application? That’s wrong on so many levels. The new version of Mail reminds me a little of Opera, which started out as a light weight browser and turned into a browser-mail-rss-torrent application.
The main new Mail feature Apple is focusing on is stationery templates; a collection of HTML e-mail templates ranging from dinner invitations to birthday greeting cards.
Are the Mail enhancements worth the $129 price tag? More HTML e-mail in my inbox? Please, tell me it’s just a bad dream!
Dashboard
Very little is new under the Dashboard sun; at least there is nothing there that will benefit me. The Widgets on your Dashboard will now sync on all your Macs if you’re a .Mac user, but since I’m not, it’s not too important to me. It could even be that this is a feature that exists already in Tiger.
Are the Dashboard enhancements worth the $129 price tag? What enhancements?
Time Machine
Leopard’s Time Machine backs up all your files automatically to another internal hard drive, an external hard drive or even to a networked storage solution if you have that available. Why is this useful? If you have ever experienced a hard drive crash and you’re not taking regular backups, you know the answer to that question.
I’ve experienced two hard drive crashes, and if Time Machine works as well as Apple say it will, the feature is almost as useful as being able to go back in time with this week’s lottery numbers.
It should be mentioned that this feature is not entirely new; Windows Vista has a feature called Shadow Copy that is very similar. The main difference is that Apple’s version looks a lot better.
Is the Time Machine enhancements worth the $129 price tag? Hell, yeah, Time Machine is reason enough for me to queue up for the Leopard release in October. I’ll even buy an external hard drive.
Leopard Analysis Summary
It’s hard to come up with revolutionary ideas in the world of operating system development. Microsoft is struggling, and so is Apple. My impression is that the main focus with both Vista and the new version of OS X is the visual enhancements. At some point people will get bored with new interface gimmicks and start to look for other reasons to spend their hard earned money on new operating systems and upgrades. At least I know I am. Apple won me over with Time Machine this time, without that feature, an upgrade would have been very unlikely. But Time Machine, that’s a killer feature for you right there.
Feedback
Do you have any thoughts you want to share? A question, maybe? Or is something in this post just plainly wrong? Then please send an e-mail to
vegard at vegard dot net with your input. You can also use any of the other points of contact listed on the About page.
Asbjørn Ulsberg
It’s probably just me being old fashioned. I prefer to have e-mails in my e-mail client and RSS in my RSS reader.
Asbjørn Ulsberg
Well, it’s your choice of course, but seeing how many similarities and how few differences it really is between e-mail and feeds, I think it’s great to have both living side by side in Opera. The same goes for news (nntp a.k.a. Usenet), although I rarely use that anymore.